Home > SKI Boots > Comparison

Compare	Fischer SOMA Progressor 100 Ski Boots 2012	VS	Dalbello Sherpa 5/5 ID 2013

Add another Item to this comparison Add Item

Overview:

There are 23 differences and 14 similarities between Fischer SOMA Progressor 100 Ski Boots 2012, Dalbello Sherpa 5/5 ID 2013

General
Brand		Fischer	vs	Dalbello
	[X] Add Comment about “Brand”
Gender		Mens	vs	Mens
	[X] Add Comment about “Gender”
Model Year		2012	vs	2013
	[X] Add Comment about “Model Year”
recommended use		Downhill	vs	Alpine Touring
	[X] Add Comment about “recommended use”
Skill Level		Advanced - Expert	vs	Advanced - Pro
	[X] Add Comment about “Skill Level”
warranty		One Year	vs	One Year
	[X] Add Comment about “warranty”

Specifications
Product ID		240,406	vs	273,185
	[X] Add Comment about “Product ID”
Used		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Used”
Flex		Stiff	vs	Stiff
	[X] Add Comment about “Flex”
Actual Flex		100	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Actual Flex”
Flex Adjustment		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Flex Adjustment”
Buckle Count		4	vs	3
	[X] Add Comment about “Buckle Count”
Number of Micro Buckles		Four	vs	3
	[X] Add Comment about “Number of Micro Buckles”
Buckle Material		Aluminum	vs	Aluminum
	[X] Add Comment about “Buckle Material”
Forefoot Width		100 mm	vs	100 mm
	[X] Add Comment about “Forefoot Width”
Width		Medium (100-103mm)	vs	Medium (100-103mm)
	[X] Add Comment about “Width”
Freestyle		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Freestyle”
Sidecountry		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Sidecountry”
Race		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Race”
Ski/Walk		No	vs	Yes
	[X] Add Comment about “Ski/Walk”
Cuff Alignment		Single	vs	None
	[X] Add Comment about “Cuff Alignment”
Prewired For Heat		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Prewired For Heat”
Special Features		Soma-tec, X-rail	vs	Vibram Soles With Quadrablock Stability Pylons, Cabrio Design
	[X] Add Comment about “Special Features”
Additional Details		, Soma-tec Abducted Stance, Single Cuff Alignment, X-rail Transfers Energy More Efficiently, Heat System Ready, Changeable Toe And Heel Plates, Rapid Slide System, Four Microadjustable Aergo 3 Aluminum Buckles, , Ffs Sport Liner, Full Thermoformable Fit, Sensitive Neoprene Toebox	vs	Cabrio Design Hem Polyurethane Construction, Low Cuff Hinge, Bio-stride Double Hinge Tongue, Twin Hinge Ski/walk Mechanism, Dynalink Rearfoot Retention, Vibram Sole With Qudrablock Stability Pylons, 1912g / Half Pair (@ Size 26), Rockered Geometry, Id Custom Liner
	[X] Add Comment about “Additional Details”

Description
Description 1		100 Flex PU Shell and Cuff	vs	Cabrio Design Hem Polyurethane Construction
	[X] Add Comment about “Description 1”
Description 2		Soma-tec Abducted Stance	vs	Low Cuff Hinge
	[X] Add Comment about “Description 2”
Description 3		Single Cuff Alignment	vs	Bio-stride Double Hinge Tongue
	[X] Add Comment about “Description 3”
Description 4		X-rail Transfers Energy More Efficiently	vs	Twin Hinge Ski/walk Mechanism
	[X] Add Comment about “Description 4”
Description 5		Heat System Ready	vs	Dynalink Rearfoot Retention
	[X] Add Comment about “Description 5”
Description 6		Changeable Toe And Heel Plates	vs	Vibram Sole With Qudrablock Stability Pylons
	[X] Add Comment about “Description 6”
Description 7		Rapid Slide System	vs	1912g / Half Pair (@ Size 26)
	[X] Add Comment about “Description 7”
Description 8		Four Microadjustable Aergo 3 Aluminum Buckles	vs	Rockered Geometry
	[X] Add Comment about “Description 8”
Description 9		35 mm Velcro Powerstrap	vs	Id Custom Liner
	[X] Add Comment about “Description 9”
Description 10		Ffs Sport Liner	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Description 10”
Description 11		Full Thermoformable Fit	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Description 11”
Description 12		Sensitive Neoprene Toebox	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Description 12”
Description 13		H.i.p.e. Material Creates Maximum Warmth And The Best Fit	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Description 13”