Home > SKI Boots > Comparison

Compare	Fischer SOMA Progressor 100 Ski Boots 2012	VS	Fischer Soma Progressor 10 Ski Boots 2013

Add another Item to this comparison Add Item

Overview:

There are 17 differences and 20 similarities between Fischer SOMA Progressor 100 Ski Boots 2012, Fischer Soma Progressor 10 Ski Boots 2013

General
Brand		Fischer	vs	Fischer
	[X] Add Comment about “Brand”
Gender		Mens	vs	Mens
	[X] Add Comment about “Gender”
Model Year		2012	vs	2013
	[X] Add Comment about “Model Year”
recommended use		Downhill	vs	Downhill
	[X] Add Comment about “recommended use”
Skill Level		Advanced - Expert	vs	Advanced Intermediate - Expert
	[X] Add Comment about “Skill Level”
warranty		One Year	vs	One Year
	[X] Add Comment about “warranty”

Specifications
Product ID		240,406	vs	278,817
	[X] Add Comment about “Product ID”
Used		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Used”
Flex		Stiff	vs	Stiff
	[X] Add Comment about “Flex”
Actual Flex		100	vs	100
	[X] Add Comment about “Actual Flex”
Flex Adjustment		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Flex Adjustment”
Buckle Count		4	vs	4
	[X] Add Comment about “Buckle Count”
Number of Micro Buckles		Four	vs	4
	[X] Add Comment about “Number of Micro Buckles”
Buckle Material		Aluminum	vs	Aluminum
	[X] Add Comment about “Buckle Material”
Forefoot Width		100 mm	vs	100 mm
	[X] Add Comment about “Forefoot Width”
Width		Medium (100-103mm)	vs	Medium (100-103mm)
	[X] Add Comment about “Width”
Freestyle		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Freestyle”
Sidecountry		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Sidecountry”
Race		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Race”
Ski/Walk		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Ski/Walk”
Cuff Alignment		Single	vs	Dual
	[X] Add Comment about “Cuff Alignment”
Prewired For Heat		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Prewired For Heat”
Special Features		Soma-tec, X-rail	vs	X Rail System, Ffs Performance Fit Liner
	[X] Add Comment about “Special Features”
Additional Details		, Soma-tec Abducted Stance, Single Cuff Alignment, X-rail Transfers Energy More Efficiently, Heat System Ready, Changeable Toe And Heel Plates, Rapid Slide System, Four Microadjustable Aergo 3 Aluminum Buckles, , Ffs Sport Liner, Full Thermoformable Fit, Sensitive Neoprene Toebox	vs	X Rail System, Rapid Slide System, Ffs Performance Liner, H.i.p.e. Liner, Heat System Ready, , Best Fits A Medium To Narrow Forefoot And Medium To Narrow Shaft Of The Leg, Soma Technology
	[X] Add Comment about “Additional Details”

Description
Description 1		100 Flex PU Shell and Cuff	vs	X Rail System
	[X] Add Comment about “Description 1”
Description 2		Soma-tec Abducted Stance	vs	Rapid Slide System
	[X] Add Comment about “Description 2”
Description 3		Single Cuff Alignment	vs	Ffs Performance Liner
	[X] Add Comment about “Description 3”
Description 4		X-rail Transfers Energy More Efficiently	vs	H.i.p.e. Liner
	[X] Add Comment about “Description 4”
Description 5		Heat System Ready	vs	Heat System Ready
	[X] Add Comment about “Description 5”
Description 6		Changeable Toe And Heel Plates	vs	35 mm Velcro Strap
	[X] Add Comment about “Description 6”
Description 7		Rapid Slide System	vs	Best Fits A Medium To Narrow Forefoot And Medium To Narrow Shaft Of The Leg
	[X] Add Comment about “Description 7”
Description 8		Four Microadjustable Aergo 3 Aluminum Buckles	vs	Soma Technology
	[X] Add Comment about “Description 8”
Description 9		35 mm Velcro Powerstrap	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Description 9”
Description 10		Ffs Sport Liner	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Description 10”
Description 11		Full Thermoformable Fit	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Description 11”
Description 12		Sensitive Neoprene Toebox	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Description 12”
Description 13		H.i.p.e. Material Creates Maximum Warmth And The Best Fit	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Description 13”