Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
Brand
Nordica
vs
Atomic
Gender
Womens
vs
Womens
Model Year
2012
vs
2013
recommended use
Downhill
vs
Downhill
Skill Level
Advanced Intermediate - Expert
vs
Advanced - Expert
warranty
One Year
vs
One Year
Specifications
Product ID
267,100
vs
276,305
Used
No
vs
No
Flex
Soft
vs
Medium
Actual Flex
95
vs
90
Flex Adjustment
No
vs
No
Buckle Count
4
vs
4
Number of Micro Buckles
4
vs
4
Buckle Material
Aluminum
vs
Aluminum
Forefoot Width
104 mm
vs
100 mm
Width
Wide (104-106mm)
vs
Medium (100-103mm)
Freestyle
No
vs
No
Sidecountry
No
vs
No
Race
No
vs
No
Ski/Walk
No
vs
No
Cuff Alignment
Single
vs
Single
Prewired For Heat
No
vs
No
Special Features
vs
I-flex Zones, Energy Spring Shell
Additional Details
Natural Foot Stance, Adjustable Cuff Profile, Performance Fit Womens Liner
vs
I-flex Zones, Energy Spring Shell, Asymmetrical Sport T 1 Liner With Clima Foam, , Best Fits A Medium To Narrow Forefoot, And Medium To Narrow Shaft Of The Leg
Description
Description 1
Natural Foot Stance
vs
I-flex Zones
Description 2
Adjustable Cuff Profile
vs
Energy Spring Shell
Description 3
Performance Fit Womens Liner
vs
Asymmetrical Sport T 1 Liner With Clima Foam
Description 4
vs
35 mm Strap
Description 5
vs
Best Fits A Medium To Narrow Forefoot, And Medium To Narrow Shaft Of The Leg
Compare Nordica Cruise 95 Womens Ski Boots 2012 vs Atomic Hawx 90 W Womens Ski Boots 2013 SKI Boots
cancel