Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
Brand
Nordica
vs
Fischer
Gender
Mens
vs
Mens
Model Year
2013
vs
2012
recommended use
Downhill
vs
Downhill
Skill Level
Beginner - Intermediate
vs
Advanced Intermediate - Advanced
warranty
One Year
vs
One Year
Specifications
Product ID
277,342
vs
240,414
Used
No
vs
No
Flex
Medium
vs
Stiff
Actual Flex
12.5-2-m
vs
95
Flex Adjustment
No
vs
No
Buckle Count
3
vs
4
Number of Micro Buckles
3
vs
Four
Buckle Material
Alu Buckles
vs
Aluminum
Forefoot Width
102 mm
vs
103 mm
Width
Medium (100-103mm)
vs
Medium (100-103mm)
Freestyle
No
vs
No
Sidecountry
No
vs
No
Race
No
vs
No
Ski/Walk
No
vs
No
Cuff Alignment
Single
vs
Dual
Prewired For Heat
No
vs
No
Special Features
vs
Soma Technology, Ffs Performance Liner
Additional Details
, Acp - Adjustable Cuff Profile, Tongue Rebound, , High Traction Dual-density Pu Soles, Pfp Comfort Fit
vs
, Soma-tec Abducted Stance, Dual Cuff Alignment, Heat System Ready, Rapid Slide System, Changeable Toe And Heel Plates, Ffs Performance Liner, Full Thermoformable Fit, Sensitive Neoprene Toebox, Sport Insole, H.i.p.e. Material Creates Maximum Warmth And The Best Fit
Description
Description 1
45 Degree Instep Retention
vs
95 Flex PU Shell and Cuff
Description 2
Acp - Adjustable Cuff Profile
vs
Soma-tec Abducted Stance
Description 3
Tongue Rebound
vs
Dual Cuff Alignment
Description 4
3 Piece Easy-Entry Shell Construction
vs
Heat System Ready
Description 5
High Traction Dual-density Pu Soles
vs
Rapid Slide System
Description 6
Pfp Comfort Fit
vs
Changeable Toe And Heel Plates
Description 7
vs
Ffs Performance Liner
Description 8
vs
Full Thermoformable Fit
Description 9
vs
Sensitive Neoprene Toebox
Description 10
vs
Sport Insole
Description 11
vs
H.i.p.e. Material Creates Maximum Warmth And The Best Fit
Compare Nordica Transfire R3 Ski Boots 2013 vs Fischer SOMA Viron 95 Ski Boots 2012 SKI Boots
cancel